|
Post by TheDeuce on Jan 30, 2013 21:59:40 GMT -6
The JHF Virtual Gaming Pool continues it's profitable ways!
Ottawa - $100 loss Boston - $ 50 gain ($100 bet at -200 odds) Washington - $155 gain ($100 bet at +155 odds) Pittsburgh - $124 gain ($100 bet at +124) Long Island - $69 gain ($100 bet at -145) Montreal - $63 gain ($100 bet at -160)
Thus we're up a virtual $361!
(For those following at home I've been tracking how we vote on the results of Jets games and calculating the net result for a $100 virtual bet).
JHF voters bucked the trend and picked the Habs to beat the Jets. The betting on vBookie went $1200 on the Jets with only $222 on the Habs.
How will the Panthers game pay off? The moneyline opened at +100/-120 with the Jets as the favourites.
Hence a $100 bet on the Jets will pay $83 of profit while $100 on the Panthers will pay an even $100 of profit.
Who do you like?
m.
|
|
|
Post by TheDeuce on Jan 30, 2013 22:01:57 GMT -6
Last poll was tied - first time that's happened. Executive decision - I break all ties.
I'm liking the Jets in regulation.
m.
|
|
|
Post by jetsfan85 on Jan 30, 2013 22:07:41 GMT -6
if we lose to the basement of the conference..theres an issue lol..jets in reg.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2013 22:11:07 GMT -6
7-2 Jets Montoya in Net
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2013 22:11:39 GMT -6
oh, and maybe a flying v or 2
|
|
|
Post by Ric O. on Jan 30, 2013 22:54:31 GMT -6
oh, and maybe a flying v or 2 Flying V can be a good formation, especially with Buff at the point of it... but you just can't beat that flying W!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2013 22:57:32 GMT -6
opps, burn maybe move the puck like a sliding H....
|
|
|
Post by Ric O. on Jan 30, 2013 23:00:22 GMT -6
Or how about the Mach M
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2013 0:07:15 GMT -6
Jets 3-2
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2013 0:49:23 GMT -6
5-3 Jets!
|
|
|
Post by jetsv2 on Jan 31, 2013 1:19:39 GMT -6
6-3 jets
|
|
|
Post by roublerouser on Jan 31, 2013 7:53:28 GMT -6
Jets 4 Panthers 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2013 0:33:42 GMT -6
81.8% of us are fools.
|
|
|
Post by TheDeuce on Feb 1, 2013 1:24:57 GMT -6
Anyone have any smart ass commentary on this prediction??? Oy.... m.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2013 1:46:33 GMT -6
Anyone have any smart ass commentary on this prediction??? Oy.... m. Okay... here goes... It was an unfinished sentence that was meant to be "6-3 Jets will lose." Sorry - that's as smart as my ass gets at this time of night after a long work day and a terrible Jets game.
|
|