|
|
Post by Tim on Jan 26, 2015 12:25:55 GMT -6
A very interesting conversation. Should take the 15 minutes to listen to this and share with anyone you feel should hear it. Amazing what partial facts and incomplete statements can do to twist perception. Thanks to Wheeler for digging into this to bring some of the facts to the forefront www.92citifm.ca/2015/01/25/wheeler-vs-macleans-magazine/ |
|
|
|
Post by TheDeuce on Jan 26, 2015 15:46:30 GMT -6
Link gives me a
Anyone else have better luck?
m.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Jan 26, 2015 18:50:15 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 18:57:24 GMT -6
I have just listened to this interview, and where I had no previous info on the article in question, all I had to hear was this reporter not able to even defend her own work to know that this story is a complete farse.
And where I had no use for Dave Wheeler previously because I think he's a goof and spews nothing but crud on air, I am struggling to come to grips with this new found respect for him defending Winnipeg as a whole
Good job Dave Wheeler
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 11:45:44 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Ric O. on Feb 1, 2015 0:34:14 GMT -6
^ Not always my favourite radio guy, but that was a great monologue by Currier...I agree with all of what he said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guardian on Feb 3, 2015 12:48:27 GMT -6
Thank you for this! I love how he brings the facts and she can't back them up. |
|
|
|
Post by jetsorbust on Feb 4, 2015 13:40:27 GMT -6
Link gives me a Anyone else have better luck? m. Worked for me. Not a Wheeler fan, but well done here. This article was pure junk from the moment I saw it. |
|
