Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 0:13:54 GMT -6
Who would you start for the game against the Wild?
Hutch vs Minnesota:
Nov.16 (Pavelec pulled in 4-3 OT loss) 16 saves, 0.938%
Dec 27: 4-3 OT win, 22 saves, 0.880%
Dec 29: 3-2 loss, 28 saves, 0.903%
Feb 10: 2-1 OT win, 29 saves, 0.967%
Total: 2-1-1, 95 saves, 0.922% vs Minnesota.
Pavelec vs Minnesota:
Nov 16: (pulled after 1st period of 4-3 OT loss) 8 saves, 0.727%
Should we go back to Hutch, as he has performed well against the Wild, or should we keep playing Pavelec?
|
|
|
|
Post by LTZ on Apr 5, 2015 14:04:58 GMT -6
I think they are planning on letting Pavs play until he forces their hand and they have to pull or sit him.
I could see them letting him play all remaining games.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 16:09:02 GMT -6
I think they are planning on letting Pavs play until he forces their hand and they have to pull or sit him. I could see them letting him play all remaining games. They're not going to play him on both ends of the back-to-back. It just would not make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Ric O. on Apr 5, 2015 18:34:31 GMT -6
Pavs is scaring me...Hutch does too if I remember correctly.
Maybe Hutch has had an awakening in watching from the bench...I say let's see.
|
|
|
|
Post by LTZ on Apr 5, 2015 19:38:25 GMT -6
I think they are planning on letting Pavs play until he forces their hand and they have to pull or sit him. I could see them letting him play all remaining games. They're not going to play him on both ends of the back-to-back. It just would not make sense. Pardy playing on the 4th line. Perreault on the 4th line when he returned. Buff on D or F depending on your perspective. Enstrom on the PP. I'm sure there's more examples of things that haven't made sense this year. If Pavs plays a good game in the first, I can easily see him playing the 2nd. If he has another rough one, I'll hope they put Hutch in. Even just to see how he does. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 20:28:06 GMT -6
They're not going to play him on both ends of the back-to-back. It just would not make sense. Pardy playing on the 4th line. Perreault on the 4th line when he returned. Buff on D or F depending on your perspective. Enstrom on the PP. I'm sure there's more examples of things that haven't made sense this year. If Pavs plays a good game in the first, I can easily see him playing the 2nd. If he has another rough one, I'll hope they put Hutch in. Even just to see how he does. Pavelec + Back-to-Back = Probable loss. |
|
|
|
Post by JETStender on Apr 5, 2015 22:10:04 GMT -6
Hutch vs. Minnesota. Pavelec vs. St. Louis to redeem himself from the last game there.
|
|
|
|
Post by gobombersgo on Apr 6, 2015 15:02:42 GMT -6
I still voted Hutch right now even though Pav is starting.
|
|
|
|
Post by phillymike on Apr 6, 2015 20:43:57 GMT -6
Hahahaha! Eat crow know it alls!
It'll be the same for tomorrow....Hutch should start.Hutch should start!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2015 21:06:20 GMT -6
Well I stand corrected. Pavelec played magnificent. Time for Hutch to step up to the plate against the Blues tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by phillymike on Apr 6, 2015 21:07:32 GMT -6
Well I stand corrected. Pavelec played magnificent. Time for Hutch to step up to the plate against the Blues tomorrow. hes playing tomorrow? Lol |
|
|
|
Post by Ric O. on Apr 6, 2015 21:12:06 GMT -6
I think since Pavelec played after coming off the flu, Maurice will also play him both games of the back to back. Schedule has been pretty easy the last couple of weeks and only 3 games to go so not much reason to rest anyone.
|
|
