|
Post by jetspassenger on Aug 28, 2012 1:10:18 GMT -6
As I mentioned above, I would have absolutely no problems if top-notch female golfers started their own exclusive club. Heck, I would even support their "no men allowed" policy. This policy has nothing to do with top-notch golfers. The Masters is a 5 day tournament and for the other 360 days of the year it's not top-notch golfers out there - it's filthy rich businessmen with varying degrees of proficiency in the sport. And you can bet those filthy rich businessmen conduct a lot business on the course - business that didn't include women because they weren't allowed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2012 21:15:29 GMT -6
As I mentioned above, I would have absolutely no problems if top-notch female golfers started their own exclusive club. Heck, I would even support their "no men allowed" policy. This policy has nothing to do with top-notch golfers. The Masters is a 5 day tournament and for the other 360 days of the year it's not top-notch golfers out there - it's filthy rich businessmen with varying degrees of proficiency in the sport. And you can bet those filthy rich businessmen conduct a lot business on the course - business that didn't include women because they weren't allowed. But it's still a private club in which only men were allowed. My point is that I support clubs that allow only one of the genders and that the other gender should just let it go. You are very right, though, that it is about a bunch of rich people and their very rich, private club.
|
|